Kipala
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Mstari 234:
:: As for practical dealing with all this, i have no critic in particular, i just wanted to speak my mind in the face of more, possibly shy or less-assertive new users to come. Even if things arent actually said, they should still be taken into account. --'''[[Mtumiaji:CGN2010|CGN2010]] ([[Majadiliano ya mtumiaji:CGN2010|majadiliano]])''' 14:07, 16 Septemba 2010 (UTC)
OK, I try to answer.
A) Thank you for reminding that it is important to be open for the new user who tries to make a contribution. I think here at sw we try to do that, but getting bigger makes that more difficult. We should not react too much in routine to new and imperfect contributions but remain open.
Wikipedia is here to be an encyclopedia, also for inexperienced users. My reason to write here ist that Kiswahili needs and deserves an encyclopedia and I see this one as the only real chance. Sort of Interactive we are. ''( I cannot open facebook where I live)''. As an encyclopedia we need to go for quality and have to care for standards - that we also have to continue to discuss.
B) I feel absolutely at home in this sw-wiki (at en-wiki and also de-wiki I am more of a guest). "Native speaker" may not exactly be what you had in you mind, I guess.
C) on deleting or warning tags I agree to your caveat in principle; but still the best time to put a marker is when it is visible as a new entry, otherwise it disappears and stays. In a number of cultural entries there will always be space for debate what is appropriate or not; but in cases like mbegha (as it was) I see no question - just compare to the existing [[mbega]]. That is rather Kiswahili deserves. '''[[Mtumiaji:Kipala|Kipala]] ([[Majadiliano ya mtumiaji:Kipala#top|majadiliano]])''' 15:38, 18 Septemba 2010 (UTC)
| |||