Majadiliano:The Rescuers

• WARNING: wikipedia: sw:The Rescuers does not link to gl:The Rescuers
• WARNING: wikipedia: sw:The Rescuers does not link to ta:தி ரெஸ்கியூயர்ஸ்
• WARNING: wikipedia: sw:The Rescuers does not link to tl:The Rescuers
• WARNING: wikipedia: sw:The Rescuers does not link to uk:Рятівники (мультфільм). 69.243.235.226 07:40, 21 Machi 2011 (UTC)

Know anything causing that? I believe that is a job which used to be done by the bot. Don't know anything about that!--_{Mwanaharakati}^Longa 09:19, 22 Machi 2011 (UTC)

What causes the lack of updates is the full protection in the article. I recommend you change it on all the other Disney movies as you did with The Fox and the Hound. And as you said in the discussion there, all the Disney pages are vandalism targets. The reason for that? en:WP:LTA/BF101. He's the same guy who both put in machine translations AND "Spider's Web: A Pig's Tale". And two other pages aren't protected but should be: Charlotte's Web, and Home on the Range. I think you should protect Pinocchio also just to be safe. Even on One Hundred and One Dalmatians, I think it should be changed to indefinite because the same vandal with no doubt hit the article when it expires 6 April 2011. 69.243.235.226 22:33, 25 Machi 2011 (UTC)

Can the article on The Rescuers Down Under be created? Also, Bambifan101 has not vandalized since 26 Machi 2011, so can the page protection on The Fox and the Hound be lifted? However, there are still machine translations in these articles (some of them). Dumbo and Bambi for example. They are machine translations of the Simple English versions. I left a note about Dumbo at the discussion. Finally, when Pinocchio and Charlotte's Web were both moved to include their years in the disambiguation, redirects were left over. But shouldn't Charlotte's Web be about the book? And what do English and other languages say about Pinocchio? 2600:1700:53F0:AD70:894F:C186:584A:3F31 19:32, 10 Machi 2021 (UTC)